ABSTRACT
Since the beginning of the pandemic, repeated attempts have been made to develop etiotropic therapy for a novel coronavirus infection. Hydroxychloroquine, lopinavir/ritonavir, etc. derivatives were used as antiviral agents, however, they demonstrated a low efficiency and an insufficient safety. In this connection, other groups of drugs with a more effective and safe pharmacological profile are currently being actively used. The aim of the study was to analyze the literature references on the efficacy and safety of antiviral drugs for the COVID-19 treatment.Materials and methods. When searching for the materials for the review article writing, such databases as PubMed, Google Scholar, e-Library were used. The search was carried out on publications for the period from January 2020 to September 2022. The key queries were: COVID-19, etiotropic therapy;immunological drugs;antiviral drugs;interferons.Results. Currently, there are various degrees of effective etiotropic drugs for the treatment of COVID-19 patients. The review has considered a few groups of drugs that are of interest from the point of view of etiotropic therapy: immunological drugs (anticovid plasma, the drugs based on antiviral antibodies, the drugs of recombinant interferons-alpha 2 and-beta 1, as well as interferon inducers, i.e., the drugs based on double-stranded RNA sodium salt, and others);drugs that block the penetration of the virus into the cell (umifenovir);the drugs that disrupt the process of the viral replication (favipiravir, remdesivir, molnupiravir, nirmatrelvir/ritonavir).Conclusion. Synthetic antivirals, in particular favipiravir, molnupiravir, remdesivir, and nirmatrelvir/ritonavir, have the largest evidence base for their efficacy and safety. The search for new effective and safe etiotropic drugs for the treatment of COVID-19, as well as the collection and analysis of post-registration data on the drugs already used in clinical practice, continues.
ABSTRACT
Since the beginning of the pandemic, repeated attempts have been made to develop etiotropic therapy for a novel coronavirus infection. Hydroxychloroquine, lopinavir/ritonavir, etc. derivatives were used as antiviral agents, however, they demonstrated a low efficiency and an insufficient safety. In this connection, other groups of drugs with a more effective and safe pharmacological profile are currently being actively used. The aim of the study was to analyze the literature references on the efficacy and safety of antiviral drugs for the COVID-19 treatment. Materials and methods. When searching for the materials for the review article writing, such databases as PubMed, Google Scholar, e-Library were used. The search was carried out on publications for the period from January 2020 to September 2022. The key queries were: COVID-19, etiotropic therapy;immunological drugs;antiviral drugs;interferons. Results. Currently, there are various degrees of effective etiotropic drugs for the treatment of COVID-19 patients. The review has considered a few groups of drugs that are of interest from the point of view of etiotropic therapy: immunological drugs (anticovid plasma, the drugs based on antiviral antibodies, the drugs of recombinant interferons-alpha2 and -beta1, as well as interferon inducers, i.e., the drugs based on double-stranded RNA sodium salt, and others);drugs that block the penetration of the virus into the cell (umifenovir);the drugs that disrupt the process of the viral replication (favipiravir, remdesivir, molnupiravir, nirmatrelvir/ritonavir). Conclusion. Synthetic antivirals, in particular favipiravir, molnupiravir, remdesivir, and nirmatrelvir/ritonavir, have the largest evidence base for their efficacy and safety. The search for new effective and safe etiotropic drugs for the treatment of COVID-19, as well as the collection and analysis of post-registration data on the drugs already used in clinical practice, continues. Copyright © 2022 Volgograd State Medical University, Pyatigorsk Medical and Pharmaceutical Institute. All rights reserved.
ABSTRACT
At the present time, studying humoral immunity to the new coronavirus infection is among the most important tasks. The COVID-19 infection induces a protective pool of specific antibodies determining severity and duration of such immune protection after convalescence. The antibody testing is also necessary for assessing efficiency of anti-COVID vaccines in order to defeat the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. Despite enormous interest of scientific community in this problem seen in the literature, there is still a lack for longitudinal observations of immunological status (more than 6 months) in the patients who have undergone COVID-19. The aim of this study is a long-term monitoring (9-14 months) of development and extinction of immune response to SARS-CoV-2 infection using quantitative assessment of IgA and IgG levels in peripheral blood of the patients who had COVID-19 in anamnesis. Monitoring of anti-SARS-CoV-2 levels over time has demonstrated significant individual variability, and made it possible to divide the study participants into three groups, according to characteristic features of humoral immunity after documented COVID-19. The study describes characteristic features of humoral immune response for each of these groups. The first group (30% of the study group) exhibited classical pattern of antibody response to viral infection. The second group (40% of study participants) presented with high plasma IgA levels, and their significant excess (about 2 times) over IgG levels throughout the observation period. The third group (30% of study participants), apparently comprised the subjects with increased humoral immunity to SARS-CoV-2 infection. Their plasma antibodies remain at high levels for at least 9-10 months after the onset of infection. The data obtained confirm the pattern of plasma IgA which is not quite typical to viral infections in dynamics after a sufficiently long time period after the disease in most study participants (2nd and 3rd groups;70% of all volunteers who have recovered from COVID-19) and suggests an important role of this immunoglobulin against SARS-CoV-2 infection. The specific responses of anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG are very similar to behavior of such antibodies in other viral infections including contacts with coronaviruses from earlier generations. Humoral immunity against SARS-CoV-2 may persist for more than 6 months, thus supporting an assumption that the naturally infected patients are able to resist re-infection for a long time.
ABSTRACT
AIM: To determine the level of SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence among the Novosibirsk Region population against the background of the COVID-19 pandemic. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The work was carried out in 2 phases: 1) a cross-sectional cohort study performed 28.06- 15.07.2020; 2) longitudinal cohort 3-stage seromonitoring: 1st stage 28.06-15.07.2020; 2nd 14.09-04.10.2020; 3rd 10-30.12.2020 The work was carried out according to a unified methodology developed by Rospotrebnadzor with the participation of St-Petersburg Pasteur Institute, taking into account the recommendations of the WHO. IgG antibodies to the SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid protein were detected by ELISA using a kit of reagents produced by the SRCMSB (Obolensk) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Statistical analysis was performed using Microsoft Excel 2010 and other programs. RESULTS: The seroprevalence in the region's population was 9.1% (95% CI 8.0-10.2): maximum in children 14-17 years old (17.6%, 95% CI 12.3-23.9) and persons over 75 years (14.8%, 95% CI 11.4-18.8), minimum among persons 30-39 years old (4.9%, 95% CI 3.0-8.0). Increased rate was noted among the unemployed (15.4%, 95% CI 9.9-17.1) and other individuals (13.0%, 95% CI 8.6-18.5). Seroprevalence was 33.3% (95% CI 16.3-59.0) in COVID-19 convalescents and 19.0% (95% CI 13.9-25.0) in contact persons. More than 94.7% (95% CI 91.2-97.2) of seropositive individuals were asymptomatic. During the serological monitoring, seroprevalence increased from 7.4% (95% CI 6.2-8.9) at 1st stage 1 to 12.4% (95% CI 10.6-14.3) at 2nd , and 31% (95% CI 28.8-33.3) at 3rd stage. CONCLUSION: SARS-CoV-2 herd immunity has not reached the threshold level, this does not exclude exacerbation of the epidemic process.